About

What is insightSci?

insightSci (Insights for Science) is a scientific intelligence platform designed to transform scholarly data into actionable knowledge that supports research, discovery, and innovation.

The platform enables researchers, graduate students, faculty members, universities, research centers, and innovation organizations to explore scientific landscapes, identify influential authors and institutions, analyze research trends, evaluate scientific impact, discover emerging opportunities, and uncover knowledge gaps across any field of study.

By integrating bibliometrics, scientometrics, network analysis, data science, and artificial intelligence, insightSci transforms large volumes of scientific information into structured insights that support evidence-based decision-making throughout the research process.

More than a search tool, insightSci provides a comprehensive environment for scientific mapping, literature exploration, research evaluation, publication strategy, institutional benchmarking, and knowledge discovery. Its mission is to help researchers better understand how knowledge evolves, where opportunities for contribution exist, and how scientific evidence can be transformed into meaningful impact.


Research Mapping Intelligence

A framework for how knowledge is actually produced

Scientific research does not begin with a blank page. It begins with a question - and behind every good question is a researcher who has mapped the field, understood what has already been established, identified where the gaps are, and positioned their contribution with precision. That process has always existed. What was missing was a structured, teachable, and technology-supported way to carry it out.

Research Mapping Intelligence (RMI) is that framework. Developed over four years of direct work with graduate researchers across master's and doctoral programs, RMI formalizes the three cognitive layers that underpin rigorous scientific knowledge production - and gives researchers the tools to navigate each one with confidence.

At insightSci, we believe that artificial intelligence should enhance scientific thinking, not replace it. Our approach - Augmented Scientific Intelligence - combines scientific evidence, structured analytical processes, and responsible AI to support rigorous knowledge creation. The researcher remains at the center. AI acts as an intelligent partner that helps organize information, identify patterns, reveal opportunities, and accelerate analytical tasks - while preserving the critical thinking, creativity, and scientific judgment that drive meaningful discoveries.

Layer 1 - Research Mapping

What does the field already know?

The first layer orients the researcher within the existing body of scientific knowledge. Before formulating a hypothesis or defining a research problem, the researcher needs to understand the landscape: who is producing knowledge on this topic, in which countries and institutions, through which journals, in what volume, and with what trajectory over time.

insightSci surfaces this structure from a single topic search - generating an analytical workspace across global scientific production, author networks, journal rankings, institutional output, and temporal trends. The researcher does not read thousands of papers to understand a field. They read the field first, then decide which papers matter.

This layer directly supports researcher formation: it teaches doctoral and master's students to approach the literature strategically rather than reactively, developing the habit of evidence-based orientation before committing to a research direction.

Layer 2 - Gap Discovery

What does the field not yet know?

The second layer is where scientific contribution begins. Once the landscape is mapped, the researcher turns to a more demanding question: where are the unexplored intersections, the underrepresented geographies, the theoretical tensions that remain unresolved, the empirical silences that no study has addressed?

Gap discovery is the most cognitively demanding stage of the research process - and historically the least supported by tools. insightSci addresses this through the Dataset and Library surfaces, where researchers can filter, weight, annotate, and tag their selected corpus with their own conceptual framework.

AI assists by cross-referencing the selected references against the broader corpus, surfacing patterns that would take weeks to identify manually: topics cited together but never studied jointly, regions absent from the conversation, or periods with no empirical output on a given theme.

The gaps AI surfaces are starting points, not conclusions. It is the researcher's theoretical expertise, disciplinary knowledge, and intellectual judgment that determines which gap is worth pursuing - and why.

Layer 3 - Knowledge Synthesis

What new knowledge can be produced?

The third layer is where the researcher moves from understanding to contribution. With the field mapped and the gap identified, the work of synthesis begins: integrating the existing evidence, positioning the new contribution, and building the theoretical and empirical argument that advances the field.

The AI Literature Review Workspace supports this layer directly. The researcher selects the references, defines the research objectives and theoretical focus, tags each reference with their own conceptual notes, and configures the review style, tone, and citation format.

The AI then synthesizes a structured literature review grounded exclusively in the curated corpus - following the researcher's framework, not a generic summary of the topic.

The output is a draft, not a deliverable. What the AI produces is scaffolding - a structured starting point that the researcher refines, challenges, expands, and transforms through their own expertise. The final contribution is always theirs.

The researcher as protagonist

RMI is built on a foundational conviction: artificial intelligence does not produce scientific knowledge. Researchers do.

What AI can do - and what insightSci is designed to make it do - is amplify the researcher's capacity to navigate complexity, process scale, and structure synthesis. It compresses the time spent on orientation so the researcher can invest more in the work that only they can do: generating original questions, interpreting evidence through a disciplinary lens, making conceptual connections that no algorithm anticipates, and producing the kind of insight that moves a field forward.

The new in science comes from researchers. From their questions, their disciplinary depth, their willingness to pursue what the field has not yet addressed. insightSci exists to make that pursuit more structured, more efficient, and more grounded in evidence - so that the energy researchers invest in the process translates more directly into the contribution that only they can make.

Built for researcher formation

RMI was designed not only as a research tool but as a formative framework - one that helps graduate students and early-career researchers develop the habits of mind that rigorous scientific practice requires.

When a doctoral student works through the three layers of RMI, they are not just conducting a literature review. They are learning to read a field before reading papers. They are learning to identify gaps systematically rather than intuitively. They are learning to position their contribution with precision rather than assumption. They are learning, in other words, what it means to produce knowledge rather than merely consume it.

That formative dimension is what distinguishes insightSci from a search tool or a citation manager. It is a structured environment for scientific thinking - one that supports the researcher at every stage of the process, from the first search to the final synthesis.


How insightSci Works

From query to workspace - how your data is collected and analyzed

1

Search

Enter your research topic using insightSci's Simple or Advanced Search. The Advanced Search mode allows you to combine title keywords, abstract terms, author names, institutions, date ranges, document types, and boolean operators to define the exact scope of your inquiry. From that query, the system searches a global scholarly index with broad coverage and high precision - surfacing relevant scientific production from across the world, regardless of field, language, or geography.

2

Scope preview

Before the full dataset is assembled, the system opens an immediate preview of your query. This lets the analytical workspace become useful without delay, giving you an early sense of the field's volume and structure while the ranked result set is being prepared in the background.

3

Dataset assembly and ranking

A single query can match an enormous volume of scientific records - potentially hundreds of thousands of publications across the global index. insightSci does not return all of them. Instead, the system selects and ranks the most relevant and impactful records for your topic, applying a composite performance metric that considers query relevance, citation impact, publication recency, and journal influence. The result is a curated working dataset of up to 1,000 publications - the records most directly aligned with your research theme, already ranked by scientific significance. If your query returns fewer than 1,000 matching records, every result will be included and ranked.

4

Analytics

Once your dataset is assembled, the full analytical workspace opens across six surfaces - all drawing from the same ranked corpus, all connected within the same session: Global Landscape, Authors, Journals, Networks, Dataset, and Library. Filters applied across any surface refine the working view without altering the underlying dataset.

5

Export

When your analysis is complete, you can export your dataset in CSV and Excel formats, ready to be imported into any tool your workflow requires. The exported file includes all metadata fields: titles, authors, affiliations, abstracts, citation counts, journals, DOIs, keywords, document types, languages, and countries of origin.

Why a ranked 1,000-publication working set?

The 1,000-publication working set is a deliberate design decision, not a technical limitation. Bibliometric analysis requires a coherent, manageable corpus - one large enough to reveal meaningful patterns across the field, but focused enough to remain analytically tractable. insightSci selects those records by relevance and scientific importance, ranks them by a composite performance metric, and opens the workspace immediately. If your query matches more than 1,000 works in the global index, the broader match count remains visible as context - so you always understand the full scale of the field - while the analytics and export operate on the curated ranked set. If it matches fewer, every result is included.

Search result caching

If you run the same query - identical filters and parameters - within 30 days, insightSci reuses the previously assembled dataset rather than rebuilding it from scratch. This ensures analytical consistency: when you return to refine your analysis, you are working with the same ranked corpus as before. The session header shows when your data was last updated.

What happens while you wait

When you search a new topic for the first time, insightSci does not simply return a list of links. It builds a complete analytical workspace tailored to your query. The first results appear quickly, and the broader dataset continues to grow in the background - without blocking the workspace or requiring you to wait before exploring.

Here is what is happening behind the scenes:

Collecting

The system queries the global scholarly index, counts the full match set, and retrieves the first relevance-ranked publications needed to open the workspace. For each publication, it gathers the full title, every listed author with their institutional affiliations, abstract, publication year, journal, citation count, DOI, keywords, document type, language, and country of origin.

Processing

Each record is analyzed and organized: authors are matched to their profiles, keywords are categorized, journals are linked to SJR metrics by ISSN where available, and geographic data is mapped to countries of origin. This analytical groundwork is what makes all six interactive surfaces possible.

Storing

The complete dataset is saved to a private workspace linked to your account. Once stored, all six surfaces - Global Landscape, Authors, Journals, Networks, Dataset, and Library - become instantly interactive. You can filter, sort, annotate, and export without any additional waiting.

Why not instant?

A traditional database search shows results almost immediately - but then the researcher must manually open each paper, extract metadata, organize it in a spreadsheet, and build their own analysis. insightSci performs that work automatically while keeping the first analytical view fast. The ranked working set means you are exploring a curated, scientifically prioritized corpus from the moment the workspace opens.

Returning to your data

If you search the same topic again within 30 days, your workspace loads without delay. The system recognizes the existing dataset and makes it available immediately - analytics appear in seconds rather than minutes.

This also benefits the broader research community: if another researcher has recently searched the same topic with the same parameters, the system can assemble your workspace from that existing dataset without collecting everything from scratch. You receive your own private copy of the data - the original researcher's workspace is never affected, and your analyses remain fully independent.


Understanding the Analytics

Each analytics surface in insightSci examines your working dataset from a different angle.

Global Landscape

The geographic view. Contributor and institution rankings sit beside the global production map so you can identify which countries and organizations lead research in your topic and where geographic gaps may exist.

Authors

The people view. A citation-ranked chart shows the most-cited contributors in your dataset. The coauthor network panel reveals collaboration clusters - groups of researchers who frequently publish together. Use this to identify key contributors, collaboration structures, and seminal papers.

Journals

The venue quality view. Publication counts by journal, SJR, and SJR Best Quartile data help you assess which journals dominate your topic. Use this to identify target journals for your own submissions or to evaluate the quality profile of the existing literature.

Networks

The network view. Collaboration and co-occurrence interactive graphs that allow you to explore structural relationships between authors, journals, and research clusters.

Dataset

The evidence view. A full sortable, searchable table of every paper in your working set, with an Index relevance score, citation counts, SJR, keywords, language filters, and direct links to source documents. Use this for final inspection before export and to select papers for your Library.

Library

The reference workspace. Save selected papers into collections, organize them with concept tags and research notes, import references by DOI, export in RIS or BibTeX, generate formatted citations in APA, ABNT, Vancouver, or Chicago, and select the documents that will feed the AI Literature Review Workspace.

Cross-filtering

Global Landscape, Authors, Journals, Networks, and Data share the same filter bar in this order: Year, Citations, Type, Language, SJR, Quartile, and Weighting. When you set a filter on any of these surfaces, it applies across them — ensuring a consistent analytical frame throughout your session. Library and Scientific Review use controls specific to their workflows.


Metrics and Methodology

How the platform's performance scores are computed

insightSci derives a small set of performance indicators from your working dataset to help you compare papers and authors within the current research slice. All scores are computed in relation to the dataset assembled by your current search, so values cannot be compared directly across different sessions or queries.

Normalization

Each indicator is rescaled to the 0-1 interval using a logarithmic normalization, which prevents a small number of unusually high values from dominating the ranking:

norm(x) = log(1 + x) / log(1 + max(x))

Where x is the value for a given paper or author, and max(x) is the largest value observed in the current dataset slice.

Index — paper performance

The Index combines a paper's citation rate per year with the SJR impact of its publication venue. Citation rate captures sustained scholarly attention, while SJR reflects journal prestige using SCImago Journal Rank data matched to OpenAlex venue records by ISSN.

Index = citation weight × norm(citations / year) + SJR weight × norm(SJR)

The result lies between 0 and 1 and is relative to the active dataset. Two papers ranked by Index are only meaningfully comparable when they belong to the same search session.

SJR — journal impact

SJR (SCImago Journal Rank) weights citations according to the prestige of the citing journals and is distributed by SCImago Journal & Country Rank. insightSci uses the journal ISSN provided by OpenAlex to match each work to the SJR file. The same match provides SJR Best Quartile values: Q1 represents the top quartile, followed by Q2, Q3, and Q4.

Cit./Yr. — citation rate per year

Measures the average citation rate of papers where the author is listed first in the current slice, expressed as citations per year per paper. Because it is an average rather than a sum, it captures the typical impact of first-author work without rewarding sheer publication volume.

Network — collaborative reach

Counts the number of distinct coauthors an author has across the current dataset. An author who appears alongside many different colleagues will score higher than one who consistently publishes with the same small group.

Note on comparability: because every metric is normalized inside the current session's dataset, scores produced by different searches are not directly comparable. Treat them as rankings within a research slice, not as absolute measures of scholarly quality.

Data Source — OpenAlex

Advancing scientific discovery through open knowledge

insightSci is powered by OpenAlex, one of the world's largest and most comprehensive open catalogs of scholarly metadata. Developed and maintained by OurResearch, a nonprofit organization dedicated to increasing access to research, OpenAlex represents a transformative movement toward transparency, accessibility, and reproducibility in science.

We are grateful to the OpenAlex team and the broader open-science community for their commitment to making high-quality scholarly data freely available to researchers worldwide.

297M+
Works indexed
114M+
Author profiles
281K+
Sources
247
Countries
177
Languages

Global scientific coverage

This broad coverage enables researchers to explore scientific production across disciplines, regions, and institutions at an unprecedented scale — including non-English publications, regional journals, and research produced in emerging and developing scientific ecosystems that have historically been underrepresented in traditional commercial databases.

Supporting transparency and reproducible research

Because OpenAlex data is openly available, scientific analyses performed within insightSci can be independently verified, replicated, and scrutinized by other researchers without requiring access to expensive commercial databases. This aligns with the growing international movement toward Open Science and strengthens methodological transparency in bibliometric and scientometric research.

Commitment to responsible scientific analysis

No bibliographic database is perfect, and responsible research requires awareness of data limitations. Certain metadata fields — including language classification, institutional affiliations, document-type categorization, and citation counts — may occasionally contain inconsistencies or differ from values reported by other databases due to differences in indexing policies, coverage scope, and processing methodologies. insightSci encourages researchers to interpret results critically and to document their data sources and methodological choices when conducting formal scientific studies.


How to Cite insightSci

If you use insightSci in your research, we recommend citing both the platform and the underlying data source.

Suggested citation

Pessin, V. Z. (2026). insightSci: Insights for Science [Scientific intelligence platform]. insightSci Tecnologia e Inteligencia Cientifica Ltda. https://insightsci.com

Methodology statement template

Bibliometric data were collected using insightSci (Pessin, 2026), a scientific intelligence platform built on the OpenAlex scholarly database (Priem et al., 2022). A search for [TOPIC] using [DESCRIBE FILTERS: keywords, date range, document types] yielded [N] publications from a total of [TOTAL] available works on OpenAlex. The dataset was analyzed for [geographic distribution / authorial influence / keyword clustering / publication venue assessment / etc.]. Journal SJR values and SJR Best Quartile classifications were matched by ISSN from SCImago Journal Rank to assess venue impact.

OpenAlex citation

Priem, J., Piwowar, H., & Orr, R. (2022). OpenAlex: A fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.01833

Frequently Asked Questions

Bibliometric analysis requires a corpus that is large enough to reveal meaningful patterns but focused enough to remain analytically tractable. insightSci selects the most relevant and scientifically impactful records for your topic and ranks them by a composite performance metric that considers query relevance, citation impact, recency, and journal influence. If your query matches fewer than 1,000 records, every result is included. The broader match count always remains visible so you understand the full scale of the field.

When you search a new topic, insightSci opens an immediate preview so the workspace is useful without delay. Additional records are fetched, deduplicated, and stored in the background without blocking the analytical surfaces. You can begin exploring Global Landscape, Authors, and Journals while the full dataset is still being assembled. The session header indicates whether your dataset is complete or still growing.

Citation counts in insightSci reflect the OpenAlex index, which has different coverage scope, indexing policies, and update cycles than commercial databases such as Scopus or Web of Science. OpenAlex provides broader representation of non-English publications and regional journals, which may result in higher or lower citation counts for specific papers depending on the field. For formal scientometric studies, we recommend documenting your data source and acknowledging these differences in your methodology section.

Yes. Your ranked working dataset is available for export in CSV, Excel and RIS formats, including all metadata fields - titles, authors, affiliations, abstracts, citation counts, journals, DOIs, keywords, document types, languages, and countries of origin.

OpenAlex updates its index regularly, typically on a monthly basis. insightSci caches query results for 30 days to ensure analytical consistency within a session. If you need the most recent data for a topic, you can run a new search after your cached result expires, or contact us to request a refresh.

insightSci indexes all document types available in OpenAlex, including journal articles, book chapters, books, conference papers, dissertations, preprints, and reviews. You can filter by document type in the Advanced Search or within the Dataset surface using the Type filter.

SJR quartile data is matched by ISSN from the SCImago Journal Rank database. If a journal does not have a registered ISSN in OpenAlex, or if that ISSN does not appear in the SCImago file, the SJR and quartile fields will be empty for works published in that venue. This is more common for regional journals, newer publications, and conference proceedings that are not indexed by SCImago.

Yes. Your workspace, dataset, library collections, research notes, and concept tags are stored in a private account linked exclusively to your credentials. No other user can access your workspace or see your analytical sessions. When the system reuses a previously assembled dataset for an identical query, only the underlying bibliographic data is shared - your workspace, annotations, and library remain completely private and independent.

The Index is a composite performance metric computed for each paper in your working dataset. It combines the paper's citation rate per year with the SJR impact of its publication venue, both normalized logarithmically on a 0-1 scale within your current session. A higher Index indicates a paper that has received sustained scholarly attention relative to the other papers in your dataset and was published in a high-prestige venue. Because the Index is session-relative, scores from different searches cannot be compared directly.

Yes. The Advanced Search includes a language filter, and the Dataset surface allows you to filter results by language after the workspace is assembled. OpenAlex indexes works in 177 languages, so insightSci can surface scientific production in Portuguese, Spanish, French, German, Chinese, and many other languages alongside English.

Author disambiguation is handled by OpenAlex, which uses a combination of name strings, institutional affiliations, co-authorship patterns, and publication history to assign a unique identifier to each author profile. While OpenAlex's disambiguation is among the most comprehensive available in open scholarly infrastructure, it is not perfect - particularly for authors with common names or those who have changed institutional affiliations. If you notice a disambiguation issue in your dataset, we recommend verifying the author's profile directly on OpenAlex.


Founder

The researcher behind the platform

insightSci was founded by Vilker Zucolotto Pessin, a doctoral researcher in Education at the Federal University of Espirito Santo (UFES) and CEO of insightSci Tecnologia e Inteligencia Cientifica Ltda. His academic path spans Civil Engineering, Business Administration, Education, Computer Science, and Business Intelligence, and his professional work focuses on structuring Public-Private Partnerships at the Espirito Santo Development Bank.

The platform was born from direct experience in the field. Working closely with master's and doctoral students and faculty across graduate programs, Vilker observed a persistent and costly problem: researchers consistently struggled to navigate the scientific literature with structure, direction, and efficiency. Over four years of iterative development, the methods and tools that became insightSci were prototyped, tested, and refined in direct collaboration with more than 1,800 researchers across multiple fields and institutions.

That process produced not only a platform, but a peer-reviewed framework. Vilker is the author of the Smart Bibliometrics (published in Scientometrics, 2022), the Scientific Mapping Process (published in MethodsX, 2023), and the GapFinder (published in Studies in English Language Teaching, 2025) - three studies that form the scientific foundation of insightSci and its Research Mapping Intelligence framework. The platform's software and associated intellectual property are registered at Brazil's National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI).

Beyond insightSci, Vilker works as a structurer of Public-Private Partnerships at the Espirito Santo Development Bank, with a focus on urban infrastructure, smart cities, and sanitation projects. He holds a Master's degree in Engineering and Sustainable Development, an MBA in Business Intelligence, international certifications in infrastructure project development (Infrastructure and Projects Authority, UK) and in Public-Private Partnerships (CP3P-F, APMG International).

His work sits at the intersection of technology, science, and society - with a consistent focus on building methods and tools that help researchers produce higher-quality knowledge in an increasingly complex information landscape.


Contact and Support

insightSci is developed and maintained by insightSci Tecnologia e Inteligencia Cientifica Ltda., Vitoria, Espirito Santo, Brazil.

For questions, feedback, bug reports, or feature requests:

General
hello@insightsci.com
Institutional inquiries
institutions@insightsci.com
Website
insightsci.com
Company
insightSci Tecnologia e Inteligencia Cientifica Ltda.
Location
Vitoria, Espirito Santo, Brazil

If you encounter a bug or unexpected behavior, please include:

  • The analytics surface where the issue occurred
  • A screenshot if possible
  • Your browser name and version

We actively develop insightSci and value user feedback. Feature suggestions from the research community directly shape our development roadmap.